|

New
molecule identified in DNA damage response
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
In
the harsh judgment of natural selection, the ultimate measure of
success is reproduction. So it’s no surprise that life
spends lavish resources on this feat, whether in the courtship
behavior of birds and bees or replicating the cells that keep
them alive. Now research has identified a new piece in an
elaborate system to help guarantee fidelity in the reproduction
of cells, preventing potentially lethal mutations in the
process.
In experiments to be published in the December 18
issue of the Journal of
Biological Chemistry,
researchers at The Rockefeller University identified the molecule
SMARCAL1 as part of cells’ damage control response to
malfunctioning
DNA replication. In typical
cell division, many different molecules have roles in
guaranteeing the daughter strands of DNA are as identical as
possible to their parent. Some molecules check for errors or
‘proofread’ the offspring for typos, for instance;
others, when alerted to a problem, arrest the replication process
and conduct repairs.
Lisa Postow, a postdoctoral fellow in
Hironori Funabiki’s Laboratory of Chromosome and Cell
Biology, used mass spectroscopy to identify SMARCAL1 as involved
in this intricate quality control process. Working with Brian T.
Chait’s Laboratory of Mass Spectrometry and Gaseous Ion
Chemistry, Postow found the protein in a proteomics screen for
molecules that were drawn to a dangerous DNA repair problem
called a double-strand break.
In both human cells and in
cells from African clawed frog egg extract, Postow found that at
double-strand breaks, SMARCAL1 gathered with another molecule
called RPA, which is known to coat broken strands of DNA and
protect them while damage is repaired. SMARCAL1 had an added
interest, too: A mutation in the gene that produces it is
involved in a rare but lethal disease called Schimke
immuno-osseous dysplasia, a disorder that causes wide-ranging
problems including kidney malfunction, immunodeficiency and
growth inhibition.
To Postow’s surprise, she found
that removing SMARCAL1 had little effect on double-strand break
repair. However, it did facilitate a different aspect of the DNA
damage response called replication fork stabilization, a process
that holds steady the junction between parental and daughter
strands — the replication fork — when replication is
stalled because a problem has been detected. “For a
mutation that causes such wide-ranging and severe physiological
effects, it is surprising that the protein has such a relatively
small effect at the cellular level,” Postow says.
Postow’s
findings were largely corroborated by independent new research
into SMARCAL1, which was published this fall in four back-to-back
papers in Genes &
Development. The work
reveals another piece of the complex safeguards the body has in
place to protect against dangerous mutations.
“This
study also proves that the proteomic approach that Lisa has
developed with Dr. Chait can efficiently identify proteins
involving the DNA-damage recognition and repair process,”
says Funabiki. “Many more excitements are ahead of us.”
|
RSS
FEEDS
Scientific
Frontline®
The
Comm Center
The
E.A.R.®
World
News Report
Space
Weather Alerts
Stellar
Nights®
Cassini
Gallery
Mars
Gallery
Missions
Gallery
Observatories
Gallery
Exploration
Gallery
Aviation
Gallery
Nature
Trail Gallery
Scientific
Frontline®
Is
supported in part by “Readers Like You”
|