|
Storing
carbon dioxide below ground may prevent polluting above
February 7, 2007
Carbon
dioxide could be injected underground into the briny porous
rock below. Most of the CO2 gas would be immobilized (light
blue), trapped as small bubbles (white) in the pore space of
the rock (gray). Only a small portion of the CO2 (dark blue)
will continue to flow up towards the impermeable layer of
caprock (yellow). Image Credit: Ruben Juanes
|
A new analysis led by an
MIT scientist describes a mechanism for capturing carbon dioxide
emissions from a power plant and injecting the gas into the
ground, where it would be trapped naturally as tiny bubbles and
safely stored in briny porous rock.
This means that it may be
possible for a power plant to be built in an appropriate location
and have all its carbon dioxide emissions captured and injected
underground throughout the life of the power plant, and then
safely stored over centuries and even millennia. The carbon
dioxide eventually will dissolve in the brine and a fraction will
adhere to the rock in the form of minerals such as iron and
magnesium carbonates.
Carbon dioxide is one of the
primary greenhouse gases contributing to global warming. Studies
have shown that reducing carbon dioxide emissions or capturing
and storing the emissions underground in a process called
sequestration is vital to the health of our planet. But one of
the biggest risks of any sequestration project is the potential
leak of the injected gas back into the atmosphere through
abandoned wells or underground cracks.
In a paper published in a
recent issue of Water -Resources Research, MIT Professor Ruben
Juanes and co-authors assert that injected carbon dioxide will
likely not flow back up to the surface and into the atmosphere,
as many researchers fear.
"We have shown that this
is a much safer way of disposing of CO2 than previously believed,
because a large portion--maybe all--of the CO2 will be trapped in
small blobs in the briny aquifer," said Juanes, a professor
of civil and environmental engineering. "Based on
experiments and on the physics of flow and transport, we know
that the flow of the CO2 is subject to a safety mechanism that
will prevent it from rising up to the top just beneath the
geologic cap."
Researchers have considered the
possibility of sequestering CO2 beneath the Earth's surface in at
least three types of geologic formations: depleted oil and gas
fields, unminable coal seams and deep saline aquifers. Juanes'
research dealt with the third category--porous rock formations
bearing brackish water that are ubiquitous underground.
The study shows that carbon
dioxide could be compressed as it leaves the power plant and
injected through a well deep underground into a natural sublayer
consisting of porous rock, such as sandstone or limestone,
saturated with saltwater. Because of its buoyancy, the injected
gas will form a plume and begin to rise through the permeable
rock. Once the injection stops, the plume will continue to rise,
but saltwater will close around the back of the gas plume. The
saltwater and CO2 will juggle for position while flowing through
the tiny pores in the rock. Because the rock's surface attracts
water, the water will cling to the inner surface of the pores.
These wet layers will swell, causing the pores to narrow and
constrict the flow of carbon dioxide until the once-continuous
plume of gas breaks into small bubbles or blobs, which will
remain trapped in the pore space.
"As it rises, the CO2
plume leaves a trail of immobile, disconnected blobs, which will
remain trapped in the pore space of the rock, until they slowly
dissolve and, on an even larger timescale, react with rock
minerals," said Juanes. "It is a good example of how a
process that occurs at the microscopic scale affects the overall
pattern of the flow at the geologic scale."
Other co-authors are Martin
Blunt of Imperial College London and Franklin Orr Jr. of Stanford
University. The work was funded by industrial affiliates of the
Petroleum Research Institute at Stanford.
Source
/ Credit: MIT / Denise Brehm, Civil and Environmental Engineering
|