|
Under
Embargo Till: 18:00 UTC Wednesday, March 12, 2008
Posted 18:00
UTC 03/12/2008
Revealed:
the secrets of successful ecosystems
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
The productivity and
biodiversity of an ecosystem is significantly affected by the
rate at which organisms move between different parts of the
ecosystem, according to new research out today.
Scientists hope that
understanding the mechanisms which determine the diversity and
productivity of ecosystems will help ecologists and
conservationists to develop strategies to ensure that
conservation areas are highly productive and rich in
biodiversity.
The study used a lab-based
artificial ecosystem of communities of bacteria to examine what
happens when the bacteria move around and evolve to live in
different parts of the ecosystem over the course of hundreds of
generations. The scientists measured the effect this dispersal of
species has on the productivity and biodiversity of the ecosystem
over all.
'Productive' ecosystems are
defined as those that support a large total amount of living
matter, from tiny microbes up to plants and animals. Scientists
refer to this measurement of the amount of life present as an
ecosystem's 'biomass'. A number of studies in the last decade
have shown that ecosystems that have a high biodiversity -
meaning they are rich in variety of species - are also highly
productive over short time scales, but until now the underlying
processes creating this link between high levels of biodiversity
and productivity over evolutionary time scales have not been
understood.
The scientific team behind this
new research found that both the biodiversity and productivity of
an ecosystem are at a peak when there is an intermediate rate of
dispersal of species - not too little and not too much - between
different parts of the ecosystem.
When there is little or no
dispersal, populations of species that remain in harsh areas of
an ecosystem are unable to adapt to their environment due to a
low population size and lack of genetic variation. Conversely,
when there is too much dispersal in an ecosystem, species evolve
to be 'generalists' that can survive in many habitats, but fail
to thrive in any given one.
Dr Craig Maclean, one of the
authors of the study at the NERC Centre for Population Biology at
Imperial College London, explains that an intermediate rate of
dispersal creates a 'happy medium' wherein species move around
enough to ensure that harsh environments are adapted to, but not
so much that they become generalists.
Pseudomonas
fluorescens
He says: "Dispersal
constantly brings new individuals and new genes into harsh
environments, which is essential for evolutionary adaptation to
difficult environments. When species adapt to new environments it
increases the productivity of the ecosystem and it can increase
the biodiversity, as movement between different parts of an
ecosystem provides more 'niches' for species to exploit."
To carry out the study, the
research team created an artificial ecosystem for the bacterium
Pseudomonas fluorescens. The ecosystem consisted of 95 different
areas, each one containing a different food source. The
scientists introduced the bacteria - which could eat
approximately half of the 95 food sources - to the ecosystem, and
then began to manipulate the rate at which the bacteria dispersed
between the 95 different areas.
Every day during the
experiment, the team measured the biomass in the ecosystem as an
indicator of the ecosystem's productivity, and found that the
levels of biomass were highest when there was an intermediate
dispersal rate.
After 400 generations, the team
isolated bacteria from the ecosystem and measured the ability of
the bacteria to grow on each of the food sources. Using this
data, the team were able to measure the diversity of the
ecosystem, as it indicated how many different species had evolved
from the bacteria which were originally introduced to the
experiment, which could only eat half of the food sources
available.
The research was carried out by
an international team, led by Centre National de la Recherche
Scientifique scientists at Montpellier 2 University in France, in
collaboration with Imperial College London and the University of
Liverpool.
Source:
Imperial College London

|