|
Physicists
Develop Test for ‘String Theory’
January 23, 2007
By Amy Pavlak and Kim
McDonald
String
theory requires at least six extra spatial dimensions
tightly curled-up to microscopic size. Here we see two such
dimensions, curled-up into tiny spheres / shapes.
|
For decades, scientists
have taken issue with “string theory”—a theory
of the universe which contends that the fundamental forces and
matter of nature can be reduced to tiny one-dimensional filaments
called strings—because it does not make predictions that
can be tested.
But researchers at the
University of California, San Diego, Carnegie Mellon University,
and The University of Texas at Austin have now developed an
important test for this controversial “theory of
everything.”
Described in a paper that will
appear in the January 26 issue of the journal Physical
Review Letters L,
their test involves measurements of how elusive high-energy
particles scatter during particle collisions. Most physicists
believe those collisions will be observable at the Large Hadron
Collider, or LHC, a subatomic particle collider scheduled to be
operating later this year at the European Laboratory for Particle
Physics, or CERN.
“Our work shows that, in
principle, string theory can be tested in a non-trivial way,”
explained Ira Rothstein, co-author of the paper and professor of
physics at Carnegie Mellon.
Rothstein and colleagues
Jacques Distler, a professor of physics at The University of
Texas at Austin; Benjamin Grinstein, a professor of physics at
the University of California, San Diego; and Carnegie Mellon
graduate student Rafael Porto developed their test based on
studies of how strongly force-carrying particles called W bosons
scatter in high-energy particle collisions generated within a
particle accelerator. W bosons are special because they carry a
property called the weak force, which provides a fundamental way
for particles to interact with one another.
When the LHC turns on later
this year, scientists will begin to investigate the scattering of
W bosons, which has not been possible with other particle
accelerators. Because the new test follows from a measurement of
W boson scattering, it could eventually be performed at the LHC,
according to the authors.
“The beauty of our test
is the simplicity of its assumptions,” explained Grinstein
of UCSD. “The canonical forms of string theory include
three mathematical assumptions—Lorentz invariance (the laws
of physics are the same for all uniformly moving observers),
analyticity (a smoothness criteria for the scattering of
high-energy particles after a collision) and unitarity (all
probabilities always add up to one). Our test sets bounds on
these assumptions.”
He added, “If the test
does not find what the theory predicts about W boson scattering,
it would be evidence that one of string theory’s key
mathematical assumptions is violated. In other words, string
theory—as articulated in its current form—would be
proven impossible.”
“If the bounds are
satisfied, we would still not know that string theory is
correct,” said Distler. “But, if the bounds are
violated, we would know that string theory, as it is currently
understood, could not be correct. At the very least, the theory
would have to be reshaped in a highly nontrivial way.”
String theory attempts to unify
nature’s four fundamental forces (gravity,
electromagnetism, and the strong and weak forces) by positing
that everything at the most basic level consists of strands of
energy that vibrate at various rates and in multiple,
undiscovered dimensions. These “strings” produce all
known forces and particles in the universe, thus reconciling
Einstein’s theory of general relativity (the large) with
quantum mechanics (the small).
Proponents say that string
theory is elegant and beautiful. Dissenters argue that it does
not make predictions that be tested experimentally, so the theory
cannot be proven or falsified. And no particle accelerator yet
exists that can attain the high energies needed to detect
strings. Because of this technical limitation, tests of string
theory have remained elusive until now.
“Since we don’t
have a complete understanding of string theory, it’s
impossible to rule out all possible models that are based on
strings,” said Rothstein. “However, most string
theory models are based upon certain mathematical assumptions,
and what we’ve shown is that such string theories have some
definite predictions that can be tested.”
University
of California, San Diego
|