|
Chemical
Biology Suggests New Way to Thwart Brain Cancer May
15, 2006
|

Brain Tissue With Tumor A
brain biopsy full of malignant cells. The cancer is a
condition known as giant cell glioblastoma.
|
Taking advantage of a large
assortment of chemical inhibitors produced by the pharmaceutical
industry as potential drugs, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
researchers have synthesized and characterized a panel of
compounds that may lead to new treatment strategies for targeting
glioblastoma, a common type of brain tumor that usually thwarts
treatment. The compounds have also revealed new information about
insulin signaling, and could be a powerful tool to evaluate
cellular enzymes as potential targets for drug design.
The work is detailed in two
papers published in the journals Cell and Cancer Cell.
HHMI investigator Kevan M. Shokat at the University of
California, San Francisco, is the senior author on the Cell
paper, published on-line April 27, 2006, which describes a
pharmacological map of the family of enzymes known as
PI3-kinases. Zachary A. Knight, an HHMI predoctoral fellow in
Shokat's lab, is the first author of the study, which was
conducted in collaboration with colleagues from UCSF. The second
paper, published in the May 15, 2006, issue of the journal Cancer
Cell, describes the effects of inhibiting these kinases in
glioblastoma cells. Shokat and Knight collaborated on the Cancer
Cell paper with senior author William A. Weiss at UCSF.
|

Dr.
Shokat is also Professor of Cellular and Molecular
Pharmacology at the University of California, San Francisco,
and Professor of Chemistry at the University of California,
Berkeley.
|
“The drug that we
have inhibits both mTOR plus that feedback loop. The fact that it
came out as the one drug in the complete set that was the most
potent spoke directly to the hypothesis that mTOR is a good
target, but you need to also quench the feedback loop.” Kevan
M. Shokat
Scientists have devoted a great
deal of research to kinases because they may provide the key to
better understanding of a wide array of fundamental biological
processes. Kinases are a huge family of enzymes that regulate
intracellular communication by tagging key molecules with a
small, energy-packed chemical group known as a phosphate. Their
influence over processes ranging from cell growth and survival to
learning and memory makes kinases desirable targets for new
drugs, and progress in this area of research depends on the
careful definition of the roles of individual enzymes.
Shokat's lab focuses on ways to
manipulate kinases individually to investigate their specific
roles in basic biological processes and disease. Much work has
been done to tease out the roles of protein kinases—those
that transfer phosphate to proteins to modify their activity. But
in their latest study, Shokat's group turned its attention to a
family of kinases whose importance as potential drug targets has
only become apparent recently.
The phosphoinositide 3-kinases
(PI-3 kinases) are lipid kinases. They help transmit a variety of
messages from outside a cell to its interior by attaching
phosphates to lipid molecules. PI-3 kinases are critical for
regulating cell growth and survival, glucose metabolism, and the
immune response. One PI-3 kinase in particular, PI3-kinase alpha,
is often found to be overactive in cancers of the breast, colon,
stomach, and brain, and scientists suspect inhibiting this
particular kinase might be an effective way to slow or halt tumor
growth.
The human PI3-kinase family
includes at least 15 closely related proteins, and the precise
role of each one is not yet well understood. Each one has a
unique pattern of regulation, expression, and lipid or protein
targets - but different members of the family typically share
several properties.
“Many of these proteins
are co-expressed in the same cells, and subsets of them are
regulated in exactly the same way. They have the same binding
partners, and their ATP binding pockets—where drugs
bind—are absolutely conserved. Every single amino acid is
identical,” Shokat noted. These similarities have made it
difficult for researchers to understand how specific kinases
might behave differently in the first place—let alone begin
to single out family members for the kinds of detailed studies
that are needed to understand whether they are viable drug
targets.
Shokat and his colleagues
decided to tackle the problem by using a chemical approach.
Scouring patent literature for compounds that pharmaceutical
companies had produced to interfere with one or more PI3-kinases,
the scientists synthesized a panel of about 150 inhibitors. “In
the past ten years, kinases have become such important drug
targets that companies have invested billions of dollars into
research on these drugs, and they're great compounds,”
Shokat said. By using compounds already known to act against
members of the kinase family, he said, “we bypassed the
large screening effort and got to focus on the really fun part of
understanding how the compounds work and learning about the
biology.”
After synthesizing the
inhibitors, the group tested them against 55 different kinases,
including all 15 members of the PI3-kinase family, to determine
which ones were the most selective and the most potent. This
allowed the researchers to produce a map depicting exactly which
of the inhibitors could be used to study the effects of specific
PI3-kinases, detailing precisely which enzyme, or, in some cases,
enzymes, were affected by each.
The scientists then determined
crystal structures of several of the most potent inhibitors bound
to PI3K gamma in collaboration with Roger Williams' lab at the
Medical Research Council in Cambridge, England. Comparing these
structures allowed them to visualize how one chemical might
interfere with the function of a given PI-3 kinase, but still be
physically unable to affect other members of the family. This
knowledge provides the first structural explanation for selective
inhibition of a lipid kinase, and will likely be useful to
researchers who are attempting to design molecules that target
particular signaling pathways for therapeutics, Shokat said.
With their panel of inhibitors
synthesized and characterized, Shokat and his colleagues began to
use the molecules to explore how PI3-kinases affected
physiological processes. First, they investigated how the enzymes
contributed to insulin signaling. “What the
isoform-specific inhibitors allowed us to do was to send a signal
from insulin and at the very same moment inhibit either
PI3-kinase alpha, beta, delta, or gamma,” and investigate
the effects, Shokat said.
When the scientists inhibited
PI3-kinase alpha, they completely blocked insulin signaling,
preventing cells from taking up glucose. This was in contrast to
earlier studies using antibody microinjection, which had
suggested that PI3-kinase beta might take over in the absence of
PI3-kinase alpha. “That was the first major finding of
these isoform-specific inhibitors,” Shokat said.
They went on to show that
PI3-kinase beta actually produced a low level of “insulin-like
signaling,” even in the absence of insulin, to maintain
certain essential cellular functions.
“We finally found a role
for this isoform,” Shokat said, adding that their findings
help explain why, in contrast to PI3-kinase alpha, PI3-kinase
beta is never mutated in human cancers. “These isoforms are
identically regulated and co-expressed in every tissue, and it
was confusing why cancer wouldn't find the beta and activate it.
Our results suggest that beta is always on, so you can't activate
it more.”
Exploring another aspect of the
PI3-kinases' broad reach, the scientists next investigated the
ability of 20 of their most potent inhibitors to interfere with
the growth of glioblastomas—brain tumors that are
notoriously difficult to treat. Many of the inhibitors interfered
with PI3-kinase signaling, but only one managed to prevent the
cells from dividing, both in cells grown in the laboratory and in
mouse tumors.
Due to their analysis of their
panel of chemicals, Shokat and his colleagues knew that this
particular compound inhibited two different members of the
PI3-kinases: PI3-kinase alpha and a protein known as molecular
target of rapamycin, or mTOR. In their studies with cultured
cells and with mice, inhibitors that acted against either of
these kinases individually failed to halt cancerous growth, but,
Shokat said, inhibiting both targets together was highly
effective.
mTOR is named for its
sensitivity to an immunosuppressive drug that is now being tested
as a cancer therapy. According to Shokat, “There is an
interesting problem with targeting just mTOR. When mTOR gets
inhibited, it sends a signal back up the signaling pathway to
stimulate PI3 kinase activity again. So there's a feedback loop
that rapamycin induces that some people think will make the
cancer worse.”
“The drug that we have
inhibits both mTOR plus that feedback loop. The fact that it came
out as the one drug in the complete set that was the most potent
spoke directly to the hypothesis that mTOR is a good target, but
you need to also quench the feedback loop.” The results of
this study suggest that simultaneously inhibiting mTOR and
PI3-kinase alpha simultaneously may be a powerful way to prevent
the growth of glioblastoma.
Beyond what he and his
colleagues have already found about insulin signaling and
glioblastoma, Shokat expects that their panel of inhibitors will
be valuable for testing the validity of future pharmaceutical
targets. “We basically have the chemicals one needs to
apply to any process where PIP3 [a product of PI3-kinase] is
produced to help figure out which isoform is important and how
important it is,” he said. Determining how sensitive the
process is to inhibition will also be essential in deciding
whether a targeting a particular PI3-kinase is likely to be
useful.
Source
/ Credit: HHMI
|