|
July 17, 2006
Molecular
DNA Switch Found to be the Same for All Life
|

Research
led by Michael Botchan (left), Eva Nogales and James Berger
revealed that the molecular machinery behind the initiation
of DNA replication in biological cells is remarkably similar
for all forms of life on Earth.
|
BERKELEY, CA —The
molecular machinery that starts the process by which a biological
cell divides into two identical daughter cells apparently worked
so well early on that evolution has conserved it across the eons
in all forms of life on Earth. Researchers with the U.S.
Department of Energy’s Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory and the University of California at Berkeley have
shown that the core machinery for initiating DNA replication is
the same for all three domains of life - Archaea, Bacteria and
Eukarya.
In two papers that will be
concurrently published in the August edition of the journal
Nature Structural and
Molecular Biology (now
available on-line), the researchers report the identification of
a helical substructure within a superfamily of proteins, called
AAA+, as the molecular “initiator” of DNA replication
in a bacteria, Escherichia
coli (E. coli), and in
a eukaryote, Drosophila
melanogaster, the
fruit fly. Taken with earlier research that identified AAA+
proteins at the heart of the DNA replication initiator in archaea
organisms, these new findings indicate that DNA replication is an
ancient event that evolved millions of years ago, prior to when
Archae, Bacteria and Eukarya split into separate domains of life.
“The ability of a cell to
replicate its DNA in a timely and faithful manner is fundamental
for survival, but, despite decades of study, the structural and
molecular basis for initiating DNA replication, and the degree to
which these mechanisms have been conserved by evolution have been
ill defined and hotly debated,” said biophysicist Eva
Nogales, a collaborator on the Drosophila
study.
Said biochemist Michael
Botchan, also a collaborator on the Drosophila
study, “Our two papers fuse together a number of
biophysical research techniques to take our understanding of the
mechanics of DNA opening and replisome construction to a new
level.”
Biochemist and structural
biologist James Berger, a participant in both studies added, “Our
findings of evolutionary kinship between the DNA initiators in
all three domains make sense because, to paraphrase Francois
Jacob, the one thing a cell wants to do is to become two cells. A
cell can't do this if it doesn't replicate its DNA in the right
place, at the right time, and in the right manner, while
simultaneously avoiding over-replication.”
The Drosophila
results were reported
in a paper entitled: Nucleotide-dependent
conformational changes in the
DnaA-like core of the
origin recognition complex. This
study was led by Botchan and Nogales, and included Megan Clarey,
Jan Erzberger, Patricia Grob, Andres Leschziner and Berger.
Nogales and Berger hold appointments with Berkeley Lab’s
Life Science and Physical Biosciences Divisions, respectively,
and with UC Berkeley’s Molecular and Cell Biology
Department, in which Botchan is a professor. Nogales is also an
investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
The E.coli
results were presented in a paper entitled: Structural
basis for ATP-dependent DnaA assembly
and replication-origin
remodeling. Berger led
this study and his collaborators included Erzberger and Melissa
Mott.
While the research studies
behind these two papers were not coordinated, they did benefit
from “a convenient congruence of timely results,” as
Berger explained.
Protein
crystallography at Berkeley Lab’s Advanced Light Source
revealed that when DnaA protein binds with ATP, the
ring-shaped AAA+ proteins assemble into a right-handed helix.
|
“We had solved our
initiator structures in the E.coli
study just as results were being generated from the Botchan and
Nogales groups on the Drosophila
study. Once we
compared notes, we immediately pooled forces. When we
subsequently were able to dock our bacterial model into a region
of their eukaryotic structure, it solidified the evolutionary and
functional similarities between the two mechanisms.”
For the E.coli
study, Berger and his team utilized the exceptionally bright and
intense x-rays of Beamline 8.3.1 at Berkeley Lab’s Advanced
Light Source synchrotron. With the data gathered at this protein
crystallography facility, Berger and his team assembled a
high-resolution model of the molecular structure of a protein
known as DnaA, which is a member of the AAA+ family. While it has
long been known that DnaA controls the process of initiating DNA
replication in bacteria, the molecular details of its myriad
activities have until now been a mystery.
Berger’s team found that
when the DnaA protein binds with adenosine triphosphate or ATP,
the nucleotide molecule that supplies energy to all components of
a cell, the ring-shaped AAA+ proteins assemble into a
right-handed spiraling superstructure. This arrangement was
unexpected, because in other functional AAA+ complexes, the ring
assemblies are closed. In addition, the architecture indicated
that the AAA+ superhelix will wrap coils of the DNA double-helix
around its exterior, causing the familiar “spiral
staircase” of the DNA to deform as a first step in the
separation and unwinding of its two gene-carrying strands.
“It is likely that the
AAA+ rings of the replication initiators are open to allow others
proteins to dock onto the initiator complex,” said Berger.
“These other proteins can help add layers of complexity,
such as assisting with helicase loading or inactivating the
initiator after replication has begun.The open rings also
probably allow DNA to interact with the interior of the initiator
assembly.” Bacterial cells, like the cells of Achaeans, are
prokaryotes, meaning their DNA is not contained within a defined
nucleus. Eukaryotes consist of plants and animals and all other
organisms whose DNA is contained within a membrane-bound nucleus.
Whereas DNA replication in bacteria is typically initiated at a
single sites, DNA replication in eukaryotes can be an immensely
complicated multi-event affair, involving the coordinated
initiation and regulation of hundreds and even thousands of
protein machines at different sites throughout the genome.
Furthermore, the highly packaged nature of eukaryotic genomes
makes it difficult for these protein machines to access the DNA.
Because of this complexity, the mechanism for initiating DNA
replication in eukaryotes was presumed to be much different than
the prokaryote initiator.
Studies over the past decade
have demonstrated that all of the multiple events that initiate
DNA replication in a eukaryote are directed by a single complex
of proteins called the origin recognition complex (ORC). However,
until now, models of the ORC proteins have lacked sufficient
detail to identify the structure of the initiator. In their
Drosophila study,
Nogales and Botchan and their collaborators studied fruit fly ORC
using single-particle electron microscopy. Their images revealed
for the first time how the ORC when bound to ATP forms a AAA+
helical structure much like the DnaA superhelix found by Berger
and his team in their E.coli
study.
“This work provides the
first view of the mechanical transitions in ORC driven by ATP in
a higher organism,” said Nogales. “While our studies
have not yet shown the initiator wrapped around the DNA, the
structural similarity to the DnaA initiator found in the E.coli
study suggests that there are likely to be strong mechanistic
commonalities in the ways that initiators engage and remodel
replication origins, as well as in how they facilitate replisome
assembly.”
Electron
microscopy images of ORC (origin recognition complex) in
Drosophila melanogaster showed the formation of a helical
structure when the ORC was binded to ATP.
|
The idea that all three
domains of life share the same DNA replication initiator is new
and will require some re-thinking on the part of biologists who
study eukaryotes. Re-thinking will also be required for models of
DNA replication that predicted initiators would have similar
structures to the protein “clamps” and “clamp
loaders” already identified as key mechanisms in the DNA
replication process.
Said Berger, “Our work
shows that there are major structural distinctions between
assembled initiator and clamp loader complexes. This not only has
important implications for the respective functions of these
different mechanisms, it also calls into question some cherished
models in the field.”
The two studies by Nogales,
Berger, Botchan and their colleagues also show how when nature
finds a mechanism that works well, such a mechanism is conserved
through evolution.
Said Nogales, “The
specialization of DNA replication initiators took place a long
time ago, separating them from other members of the AAA+
superfamily of proteins while maintaining an identity among
themselves that reflects the importance of the replication
process. Through the millions of years, evolution has added bells
and whistles around this highly conserved central engine.”
The E.coli
study was supported by the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers
Charitable Foundation and the National Institutes of Health
(NIH). The Drosophila
study was also
supported by NIH, plus the U.S. Department of Energy’s
Office of Biological and Environmental Research and HHMI.
Berkeley Lab is a U.S.
Department of Energy national laboratory located in Berkeley,
California. It conducts unclassified scientific research and is
managed by the University of California.
Source
/ Credit: Berkeley Laboratory
|