|
Under
Embargo Till: 21:00 UTC Oct. 06, 2008
Posted:
21:00 UTC 10/06/2008
New
Blood Test for Down Syndrome
Monday, October 6, 2008
Trisomy
21–the presence of three copies of chromosome
21–causes Down syndrome. This karyotype shows the
classic appearance of trisomy 21.
|
Credit:
National Human Genome Research Institute
Howard Hughes Medical
Institute researchers have developed a new prenatal blood test
that accurately detected Down syndrome and two other serious
chromosomal defects in a small study of 18 pregnant women. If
confirmed in larger trials, they say, the test would offer a
safer and faster alternative to invasive prenatal tests such as
amniocentesis that pose a small risk of miscarriage.
Researchers have long known
that a pregnant woman's blood contains small amounts of DNA from
the fetus. Howard Hughes Medical Institute researcher Stephen R.
Quake and colleagues at Stanford University devised an ingenious
way to the scan fetal DNA present in the mother's blood to
determine whether the fetus' cells contain extra chromosomes
associated with several types of severe birth detects.
The test developed by Quake's
team was more accurate than techniques used in previous efforts
to diagnose aneuploidy by analyzing fetal DNA. Aneuploidy occurs
when there are either too many or too few chromosomes in cells.
Down syndrome, for example, is caused by a trisomy — three
copies instead of two — of chromosome 21.
“We believe this is the
first demonstration of a universal, noninvasive test for Down and
other aneuploidies,” said Quake, senior author of the
research article, which was published online in the early edition
of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
(PNAS) on October 6, 2008. “We need a larger
clinical study to understand a bit more about the best way to
implement it, but I am highly optimistic it will be used as a
diagnostic test in short order.”
Amniocentesis and chorionic
villus sampling (CVS), which are currently considered the “gold
standard” in prenatal testing, involve sampling cells in
amniotic fluid. Those cells are obtained by inserting a needle
into the mother's uterus. The procedure carries up to a one
percent risk of inducing a miscarriage. For that reason, routine
use of these invasive diagnostic tests has largely been limited
to women age 35 and older, where the age-related risk of fetal
aneuploidy outweighs the risk of miscarriage. As a result, more
infants with chromosomal defects are now being born to younger
women. Researchers have been working for years to devise
noninvasive screening tests that would be safe for that group of
women.
In addition, it takes two or
three weeks following the amniocentesis or CVS procedures to
culture the cells and study the chromosomes. That amount of time
can seem like an eternity for anxious parents waiting for the
test results, Quake said.
With the new test, scientists
only need to draw a small amount of blood from the woman. The
blood is analyzed and the results are available within a couple
of days, said Quake, who is a bioengineer at Stanford.
Quake's interest in developing
new technology to diagnose aneuploidies was sparked when he read
a research article published in the journal Science in
2005. That article discussed new methods of noninvasive prenatal
testing that relied on measurements of DNA in fetal cells present
in the mother's blood. The report said that the low prevalence of
fetal cells - only about one in one million maternal cells - made
it difficult to isolate enough of fetal cells to test for
chromosomal abnormalities.
At the time, some researchers
were trying to isolate fetal “cell-free DNA” from the
mother's blood. Cell-free DNA is fragmented double-stranded DNA
that is in the debris of dying fetal cells. Isolating this DNA
was a good idea, Quake said, but recovering the vanishingly small
amount of fetal cell-free DNA remained a challenge.
After reading the Science
article, Quake thought to himself, `A lot of my work is about
counting molecules; this is one problem I know how to do.' He had
a brainstorm: Where other researchers were developing various
ways of amplify the fetal DNA signal to distinguish it from
maternal DNA, Quake proposed a bold shortcut - skipping that step
entirely. After all, he observed, the point of screening was to
spot extra chromosomes in the woman's blood sample. Whether the
DNA being scanned was from the fetus or from the mother didn't
matter. The objective, therefore, was simply to measure the
amount of DNA in fragments mapped to the different chromosomes.
Conveniently, the cell-free DNA
floating in the mother's blood circulation normally exists in
short pieces, averaging 169 nucleotides in length. Quake proposed
a “shotgun sequencing” strategy where he would use
the very latest high-throughput gene sequencing technology and
equally powerful computers to identify millions of unique
sequence “tags” in the fetal DNA. Each of these tags
was a 25 base-pair fragment of DNA. After the tags were
identified, Quake's group could then map them to specific
locations on the 23 pairs of chromosomes. By using this strategy,
the researchers believed they could detect higher-than normal
amounts of DNA belonging to the three chromosomes involved in the
most common aneuploidies — chromosomes 21, 18, and 13.
In the experiments reported in
PNAS, Quake and his colleagues, including first author H.
Christina Fan, a graduate student in bioengineering at Stanford,
used their new technique to analyze DNA in blood samples from 18
pregnant women who were undergoing invasive prenatal testing (and
one man, for reference).
When the amounts of DNA
corresponding to each chromosome were plotted on a graph,
significant, above-normal peaks appeared when a chromosome was
present in three copies instead of two. These signals enabled the
scientists to correctly identify the 12 women who carried
aneuploid fetuses and the six whose pregnancies were normal.
Their results matched those of amniocentesis or CVS test that
were done on the women.
Quake said the
shotgun-sequencing system is not only safer than invasive
techniques but can also make a determination at an earlier
gestational age, around 12 weeks.
The earlier the couple knows
the status of the pregnancy, Quake observed, the better they will
be prepared for whatever decision they choose to make on the
basis of the information.
Quake's group is now planning a
follow-up study to evaluate the test in a larger group of
patients. He estimates that the cost of the test during the next
phase will be about $300, with DNA sequencing accounting for the
majority of the overall cost.
Source:
HHMI

|