Cell fitness used to determine outcomes in COVID patients

Cell fitness has been identified as a way of predicting health outcomes in COVID patients, according to a University of Queensland study.

The study investigated a cellular fitness marker, known as hfwe-Lose, to identify sub-optimal cells in patients who had been hospitalized or died from COVID at the start of the pandemic.

UQ Diamantina Institute’s Dr Arutha Kulasinghe said researchers conducted post-mortem analysis on COVID-infected lung tissues and found that the cell fitness marker influenced a person’s immune response to infection.

“We found that patients with acute lung injury had higher levels of the biomarker in their lower respiratory tract and areas of cell death,” Dr Kulasinghe said.

“More importantly, we also found that the cell fitness marker outperformed conventional methods, such as age, inflammation and co-existing diseases, in predicting health outcomes, such as hospitalization and death, in COVID patients.”

Assessing the level of risk in developing severe COVID infection is an important consideration in the management of the current pandemic.

Dr Kulasinghe said the study findings might be useful in the early triage of patients who test positive for COVID as the cell fitness marker could be identified via a simple nasal swab.

“The cell fitness marker would enable medical teams to identify patients more likely to develop severe symptoms, provide closer monitoring and earlier access to hospitalization and intensive care,” he said.

“We are now looking to validate our findings in larger patient populations to determine the robustness of the marker.

“The cell fitness marker is part of the body’s process for removing unwanted cells."

This study was conducted in partnership with the University of Copenhagen

Source/Credit: University of Queensland

scn101821_04

J&J coronavirus vaccine produces low antibody response

Photo by Frank Merino from Pexels

In a head-to-head comparison of the three widely used coronavirus vaccines in the United States, the Johnson & Johnson vaccine yielded a strikingly lower antibody response in a Stanford School of Medicine-led study published in the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology.

The study, which analyzed early vaccine immune response in 2,099 dialysis patients, found that 33% of those vaccinated with Johnson & Johnson did not develop coronavirus antibodies, compared with 4% of those who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and 2% who received the Moderna vaccine. The study is one of the first to compare immune response associated with antibody levels using the same blood test for all three vaccines.

“We weren’t expecting this large a difference between vaccines,” said Shuchi Anand, MD, assistant professor of nephrology and a lead author of the study. “Since part of the rationale for boosters is waning antibody response, our study strongly argues for the need for booster shots for Johnson & Johnson, particularly in the immunocompromised population.”

Less protection

Pablo Garcia, MD, a postdoctoral scholar in nephrology and co-lead author of the study, agreed that people vaccinated with the J&J vaccine are probably less protected from the coronavirus and will “most likely need a booster shot.”

The researchers, who set out to analyze antibody response in the early post-vaccination period, collaborated with a nonprofit dialysis provider that treats kidney patients undergoing dialysis in California, Tennessee, Texas and New Jersey. The tests were conducted between 28 and 60 days after each patient had been fully vaccinated.

A new treatment for glaucoma?

Photo by Ksenia Chernaya from Pexels

A Northwestern Medicine study in mice has identified new treatment targets for glaucoma, including preventing a severe pediatric form of glaucoma, as well as uncovering a possible new class of therapy for the most common form of glaucoma in adults.

In people with high pressure glaucoma, fluid in the eye doesn’t properly drain and builds up pressure on the optic nerve, leading to vision loss. It affects 60 million people worldwide and is the most common cause of blindness in people over 60 years old.

While there are a few treatments available for open angle glaucoma, the most common form of glaucoma in adults (eye drops, oral medication, laser treatments), there are no cures, and a severe form of glaucoma in children between birth and three years old known as primary congenital glaucoma can only be treated with surgery.

“Although primary congenital glaucoma is much rarer than open angle glaucoma, it is devastating for children,” said corresponding author Dr. Susan Quaggin, chief of nephrology and hypertension in the Department of Medicine at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. “New treatments and new classes of treatments are urgently needed to slow vision loss in both forms.

Using gene editing, the scientists in the study developed new models of glaucoma in mice that resembled primary congenital glaucoma. By injecting a new, long-lasting and non-toxic protein treatment (Hepta-ANGPT1) into mice, the scientists were able to replace the function of genes that, when mutated, cause glaucoma. With this injectable treatment, the scientists also successfully prevented glaucoma from ever forming in one model. This same therapy, when injected into the eyes of healthy adult mice, reduced pressure in the eyes, supporting it as a possible new class of therapy for the most common cause of glaucoma in adults (high intraocular pressure open angle glaucoma).

The study, “Cellular crosstalk regulates the aqueous humor outflow pathway and provides new targets for glaucoma therapies," was published Oct. 18 in the journal Nature Communications. (PDF)

The next step is to develop the appropriate delivery system for the successful new protein treatment in patients and bring it to production, Quaggin said.

Uncovering the secrets of ultra-low frequency gravitational waves

An artist's impression of the colliding bubbles that can produce extremely low frequency gravitational waves during a cosmological phase transition in the early Universe.
Image credit: Riccardo Buscicchio.

New methods of detecting ultra-low frequency gravitational waves can be combined with other, less sensitive measurements to deliver fresh insights into the early development of our universe, according to researchers at the University of Birmingham.

Gravitational waves - ripples in the fabric of Einstein's spacetime - that cross the universe at the speed of light have all sorts of wavelengths, or frequencies. Scientists have not yet managed to detect gravitational waves at extremely low ‘nanohertz’ frequencies, but new approaches currently being explored are expected to confirm the first low frequency signals quite soon.

The main method uses radio telescopes to detect gravitational waves using pulsars – exotic, dead stars, that send out pulses of radio waves with extraordinary regularity. Researchers at the NANOGrav collaboration, for example, use pulsars to time to exquisite precision the rotation periods of a network, or array, of millisecond pulsars – astronomers’ best approximation of a network of perfect clocks - spread throughout our galaxy. These can be used to measure the fractional changes caused by gravitational waves as they spread through the universe.

How can we eat without cooking the planet?

Oxford experts in the run up to the COP26 climate conference, Professor Jebb points out that agriculture accounts for more CO2 emissions than transportation, and she says ‘It is the single biggest cause of harm to nature.’   We need governments to make some structural changes in the food system, says Professor Jebb, but, meanwhile, we can all make a start by doing three things:    Avoid eating too much  Cut down on waste  Reduce consumption of meat and dairy

She says, some people have given up meat altogether but, Professor Jebb maintains, 'Although animals produce emissions, they are an important part of our agriculture eco-systems and provide important nutrients.'   But we need to reduce the global demand for meat, so countries that currently eat a lot of meat need to cut down. That would be good for health and the environment.  ‘Eating less meat will be  a win for people and the planet,’ she says.

Source/Credit: University of Oxford

en101821_01

Genetic risk for clinical depression linked to physical symptoms

Dr Enda Byrne

People with higher genetic risk of clinical depression are more likely to have physical symptoms such as chronic pain, fatigue and migraine, University of Queensland researchers have found.

Dr. Enda Byrne from UQ’s Institute for Molecular Bioscience said depression was a serious disorder with lifetime risks of poor health.

“A large proportion of people with clinically-diagnosed depression present initially to doctors with physical symptoms that cause distress and can severely impact on people’s quality of life,” Dr. Byrne said.

“Our research aimed to better understand the biological basis of depression and found that assessing a broad range of symptoms was important.

“Ultimately, our research aimed to better understand the genetic risks and generate more accurate risk scores for use in research and healthcare.”

Despite recent breakthroughs, Dr. Byrne said finding additional genetic risk factors was difficult because of the variety of patient ages, their symptoms, responses to treatment and additional mental and physical disorders.

Invasive Species Increasingly Threaten Protected Areas Worldwide

China's famous Red Marshes, a protected area and vital shorebird
habitat that is increasingly being overrun by invasive grasses
that are smothering the red plants.
Photo credit: Hong'an Ding

The iconic “Red Beach” marshes of China’s Yellow Sea are a critical stopover for millions of shorebirds on their seasonal migrations along the East Asian-Australasian Flyway.

But in recent years, the vivid scarlet-hued native succulent plants that give the marshes their name are increasingly being overrun by non-native invasive grasses that are turning the marshes, which the Chinese government has set aside as a protected area, into a green desert avoided by shorebirds.

A new international study suggests similar scenarios may be playing out in many protected areas worldwide.

“Invasive species such as the cordgrass that is swamping native plants in the Red Marshes pose a much greater threat to protected areas, even well managed ones, than was previously recognized,” says Brian Silliman, Rachel Carson Distinguished Professor of Marine Conservation Biology at Duke University, who co-authored the study.

“Our findings suggest it may no longer be enough to defend these coastal areas of great ecological importance from disturbances by human activities,” says lead author Qiang He, a former postdoctoral researcher in Silliman’s lab who is now a professor of coastal ecology at Fudan University in China. “We also need to find better ways to protect them from biological invaders like cordgrass, which thrive in the open habitat of low-elevation mudflats that are a preferred habitat of shorebirds and common at many of these sites.”

Silliman, He and their colleagues published their peer-reviewed study Oct. 13 in the journal Science Advances. It was selected by the journal’s editors to be the issue’s cover article.

To conduct their study, the researchers used remote sensing to analyze 30 years of Google Earth Engine satellite images of wetlands inside and outside of seven of China’s largest protected coastal areas on the Yellow Sea, including several World Natural Heritage sites and Wetlands of International Importance sites.

By measuring and comparing the speed and extent of both wetland loss - typically caused by human disturbance – and cordgrass invasion at each site, they were able to construct a time-series dataset that shows native plants and habitats within the protected areas do receive protection, just not always enough.

“Although wetland loss due to human disturbance was significantly slower in all protected areas than in the unprotected control sites, plant invasions were much higher in four of the protected areas under invasion,” says He.

That finding confounds the prevailing theory that disturbance promotes species invasions, says Silliman.

“Compared to protected areas, unprotected sites often experience strong human disturbance, have more open habitats and are, thus, expected to be more vulnerable to invasions by exotic species,” he says. “We found it’s not that cut and dried.”

“Most importantly, our findings caution blind acceptance of the current conservation paradigm that protected areas will work well as long as human activities are managed effectively. This study shows that even if they are, invasive species can wreck that feel-good party,” he says. Silliman directs the Duke Restore initiative, which brings together researchers from science, engineering and policy to develop more effective tools and practices to combat habitat loss and enhance the resilience of natural and human systems in coastal areas. Qiang He is a visiting scholar in the program.

Their new study’s publication coincided with the 15th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP15) United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity in Kunming, China.

Leaders from more than 100 nations attended the meeting. They called for “urgent and integrated action” to increase the emphasis placed on biodiversity protection in all sectors of the global economy but stopped short of committing to specific targets to slow species loss, including a long-debated proposal to protect or conserve 30% of the land and ocean within their national territories by 2030.

Funding for the new study came from the National Natural Science Foundation of China and the National Key Research and Development Program of China.

Source/Credit: Duke University/Brian Silliman

en101721_01

Carbon from a cosmic source

Partners in space: massive stars often occur in close binary systems in which one star takes mass from its companion. New research has now shown that these systems produce about twice as much carbon as individual, massive stars. © ESO/M. Kornmesser / S.E. de Mink

Computer simulations show that binary stars produce a large amount of this vital element

Many things work better in pairs. The production of chemical elements is no exception. Many elements are formed inside stars during fusion processes. Carbon plays an important role in this because it is the basis of life and thus ultimately of human beings. But how effective is the cosmic source of this important building block? A study led by the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics shows that massive stars produce twice as much carbon when they have a companion star.

The researchers know that massive stars are essential in the synthesis of all heavy elements – from carbon and oxygen to iron. Although most of these stellar heavyweights are born in multiple star systems, previous models have looked almost exclusively at single stars. An international team led by Robert Farmer from the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics in Garching has now calculated the carbon footprint of massive stars that are partners in a binary system.

The Butterfly Effect

Collected butterfly specimens from Torres Strait.
Image; Dr Trevor Lambkin

How Torres Strait Island butterflies could help conservation efforts

A University of Queensland researcher has spent decades compiling a first-of-its-kind database of the butterfly species of the Torres Strait Islands, boosting biosecurity and conservation measures in the region.

Dr Trevor Lambkin working in the field in Torres Strait.

Working closely with the Torres Strait Island Regional Council, Dr Trevor Lambkin said the database, listing 227 butterfly species will help local officials address the impacts of climate change, other human threats and weeds.

“My work has created detailed checklists and distribution maps of butterfly populations on each island for the first time, and this specific information will assist in future conservation measures,” Dr Lambkin said.

“As butterflies are prone to move from place to place, they’re very good yardsticks for use in predicting invasions of pest species.”

Dr Lambkin has made more than 30 visits to the islands over the past 38 years, discovering that several species of butterflies are now threatened by rising sea levels, directly linked to climate change.

“The threat of climate change requires urgent and well-directed conservation efforts to slow not only butterfly loss, but wider biodiversity loss,” he said.

One coronavirus vaccine may protect against other coronaviruses

Study is the first to demonstrate cross-protective immunity by vaccines

Northwestern Medicine scientists have shown for the first time that coronavirus vaccines and prior coronavirus infections can provide broad immunity against other, similar coronaviruses. The findings build a rationale for universal coronavirus vaccines that could prove useful in the face of future epidemics.

“Until our study, what hasn’t been clear is if you get exposed to one coronavirus, could you have cross-protection across other coronaviruses? And we showed that is the case,” said lead author Pablo Penaloza-MacMaster, assistant professor of microbiology-immunology at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

The findings were recently published in the Journal of Clinical Investigation.

The three main families of coronaviruses that cause human disease are:

1. Sarbecovirus, which includes the SARS-CoV-1 strain that was responsible for the 2003 outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), as well as SARS-CoV-2, which is responsible for COVID-19
2. Embecovirus, which includes OC43, which is often responsible for the common cold
3. Merbecovirus, which is the virus responsible for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), first reported in 2012.

Vaccines demonstrated cross-protective immunity

Plasma from humans who had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 produced antibodies that were cross-reactive (potentially providing protection) against SARS-CoV-1 and the common cold coronavirus (OC43), the study found. The study also found mice immunized with a SARS-CoV-1 vaccine developed in 2004 generated immune responses that protected them from intranasal exposure by SARS-CoV-2. Lastly, the study found prior coronavirus infections can protect against subsequent infections with other coronaviruses.