![]() |
A non-native species, the brown trout is, for example, highly valued by New Zealanders who have established new environmental regulations to protect the species in their waters. Credit: Hunter Brumels |
Awareness of non-native species - often called ‘‘invasive’’ - has vastly increased over the past fifty years, to the point where anyone with green conscience has heard of them and their negative effects, whether it is the zebra mussel or ragweed. However, the contribution of these species can also be positive, as some earthworms help to improve the processes involved in organic farming. This is the finding of a study conducted by a team of researchers from Brown University in the United States and University of Geneva (UNIGE) in Switzerland. These results are published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution.
Within scientific literature, long-standing biases against non-native species have clouded the scientific process and hindered public understanding. In a recent review article published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution, an international team including researchers from Brown University, the University of Geneva (UNIGE) and the University of Washington points out that the majority of studies on these species focus on their negative consequences. In this new paper, the scientists propose to shift their focus to also consider the potential benefits of non-native species for a more balanced discussion.
‘‘Positive impacts of non-native species are often explained as serendipitous surprises — the sort of thing that people might expect to happen every once in a while, in special circumstances,’’ says Dov Sax, a professor in the Department of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology at Brown University. ‘‘Our new paper argues that the positive impacts of non-native species are neither unexpected nor rare, but instead common, important and often of large magnitude.’’