![]() |
| The research found the process of restoring degraded natural ecosystems is crucial, but any climate benefits are dwarfed by the scale of fossil fuel emissions. Source: University of Melbourne |
Nature restoration cannot be scaled up quickly enough to compensate for fossil fuel emissions, new research led by the University of Melbourne has found.
Published today in One Earth, the research found that nature restoration, the process of restoring degraded natural ecosystems, is crucial but any climate benefits are dwarfed by the scale of ongoing fossil fuel emissions.
Lead author Dr Kate Dooley said nature restoration can marginally lower peak warming but should not be seen as a substitute for reducing fossil fuel emissions.
“Any form of land-based carbon dioxide removal takes decades to be realized, meaning the benefits from nature restoration could take generations to make a notable reduction in global temperatures,” Dr Dooley said.
“If we are to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement then relying on nature restoration and land management options are not the complete solution. We need policies that respect and understand the most crucial factor to mitigating rising temperature, which is to categorically move away from fossil fuels.”













