
Photo Credit: Courtesy of King’s College London
Scientists reveal that the scale of analysis determines whether invasive plants succeed by resembling or differing from native species, resolving decades of conflicting ecological evidence.
Researchers from King’s College London have uncovered why decades of ecological studies have produced conflicting evidence about species invasions.
Their findings, published in Ecology, show that the spatial scale of analysis fundamentally alters conclusions about how introduced plants interact with native communities.
The study, led by Dr. Maria Perez-Navarro in the Department of Geography, tested two long-standing hypotheses - preadaptation and limiting similarity - using 33 years of data from Cedar Creek Ecosystem Science Reserve in Minnesota.
_1.jpg)


.jpg)



