.png)
In the new study, Chad Mirkin’s team attached short DNA strands to each protein. Then, DNA pulled neighboring proteins together, assembling them into precisely designed crystals. The team also varied key design features — such as DNA strand length and placement — to determine how each variable affected crystal formation. Finally, they used X-ray crystallography to examine the resulting crystals. Image Credit: Mirkin Research Group/Northwestern University
Scientific Frontline: Extended "At a Glance" Summary: DNA-Programmable Protein Crystallization
The Core Concept: A novel methodology that utilizes flexible, single-stranded DNA as a programmable molecular glue to intentionally direct proteins into highly ordered, diffraction-quality crystals.
Key Distinction/Mechanism: Traditional protein crystallization relies on an unpredictable, tedious process of trial and error where protein surfaces weakly bond. This new approach bypasses chance by attaching specific DNA strands to proteins, leveraging the predictable base-pairing rules of nucleotides (adenine to thymine, and cytosine to guanine) to pull neighboring proteins into exact, pre-designed structural architectures.
Major Frameworks/Components:
- Programmable Atom Equivalents: The foundational concept of modifying nanoparticles—or in this case, naturally uniform proteins—with DNA to create highly predictable building blocks.
- DNA-Programmable Assembly: The utilization of defined DNA-DNA chemical interactions to govern assembly, ensuring identical alignment and orientation across the entire resulting structure.
- Single-Crystal X-Ray Diffraction: The analytical method used to shine X-rays through the resulting crystals, analyzing diffraction patterns to accurately reconstruct the three-dimensional atomic blueprint of the proteins.
Branch of Science: Structural Biology, Nanotechnology, Chemistry, Biochemistry, and Materials Science.
Future Application: The engineering of customizable, soft biomaterials tailored for advanced biosensing, targeted drug delivery, bioelectronics, and robotics.
Why It Matters: By solving one of the most notoriously unreliable steps in structural biology, this method allows scientists to consistently map the three-dimensional structures of proteins. Understanding these precise molecular architectures provides critical insights necessary for identifying new drug targets, engineering synthetic enzymes, and developing advanced therapeutics.
.png)
Image Credit: Mirkin Research Group/Northwestern University
New Approach Reveals Proteins’ Structures and Enables Next-Gen Flexible Biomaterials
In the new study, Chad Mirkin’s team attached short DNA strands to each protein. Then, DNA pulled neighboring proteins together, assembling them into precisely designed crystals. The team also varied key design features—such as DNA strand length and placement—to determine how each variable affected crystal formation.
For decades, scientists have largely relied on painstaking trial and error to coax proteins into crystalline forms. Crystallization enables scientists to determine the molecular structures of proteins, which can provide a blueprint for designing drugs, engineering enzymes, and understanding disease.
Now, Northwestern University chemists have developed a new approach that replaces a tedious, unpredictable process with intentional design.
In a new study, Northwestern scientists repurposed flexible DNA strands as a blueprint and programmable molecular glue. Using DNA, the team directed proteins to assemble into diffraction-quality, intentionally designed crystal structures with atomic-level order. The strategy enabled the scientists to precisely control how proteins connect, creating unusually soft, flexible crystals while achieving the high structural order needed to determine protein structures.
Not only does the work simplify one of structural biology’s most difficult challenges, but it also overturns a long-held assumption that flexible building blocks cannot produce crystals with atomic-level order. The approach could also enable a new generation of flexible, customizable biomaterials for biosensing, drug delivery, bioelectronics, and robotics.
“The implications of this research are profound,” said Northwestern’s Chad A. Mirkin, who led the study. “Proteins are the building blocks of life, and their structure determines their function. When we intentionally determine those structures, we gain powerful new insights into how proteins recognize other molecules, catalyze chemical reactions, and interact with living systems. That knowledge ultimately helps us identify new drug targets, design new medicines, and engineer new materials.”
A nanotechnology pioneer, Mirkin is the George B. Rathmann Professor of Chemistry, a professor of medicine (hematology and oncology), and a professor of chemical and biological engineering, biomedical engineering, and materials science and engineering at Northwestern, where he has appointments at the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, and the McCormick School of Engineering. He is also the founding director of the International Institute for Nanotechnology. Zhenyu Han, who was a graduate student in Mirkin’s laboratory at the time of the study, is the paper’s first author.
DNA as a Blueprint and Construction Material
From fighting infections to digesting food, proteins carry out nearly every essential task inside living cells. To understand how these molecular machines work—and design drugs to target them—scientists need to determine their three-dimensional structures.
X-ray crystallography is the gold standard for revealing these structures. In this technique, scientists first coax billions of identical proteins to assemble into a crystal. Then, they shine X-rays through the crystal and analyze the resulting diffraction patterns to reconstruct the protein’s atomic structure. But persuading proteins to form suitable crystals is often one of the most difficult and unpredictable steps in the process.
To improve this unreliable step, Mirkin turned to flexible snippets of single-stranded DNA. In a 1996 study published in Nature, Mirkin and his team used complementary DNA strands to assemble gold nanoparticles into ordered structures. Since then, his lab and many others have used DNA as a programmable bonding element to organize nanoparticles, polymers, and other nanoscale building blocks into ordered structures.
“Over thirty years ago, the Mirkin group proposed the idea to take nanoparticles and modify them with DNA to create programmable atom equivalents,” Han said. “Nature’s nanoparticles are proteins. The difference between synthetic nanoparticles and proteins is that proteins are naturally uniform and molecularly precise. So, if we modify proteins with DNA and assemble them, we can form high-quality, atomically precise crystals, overcoming a decades-old challenge in the field of DNA-programmable assembly.”
How DNA Pulls Proteins Together
Normally, proteins crystallize because parts of their surfaces happen to stick together through multiple weak chemical interactions. By contrast, Mirkin’s team exploited DNA’s natural tendency to seek out its perfect match. Each DNA strand is made up of four chemical “letters”—A, T, C, and G—that pair in predictable ways. For example, A always pairs with T, and C always pairs with G. When two complementary DNA strands encounter one another, they spontaneously snap together to form the familiar double helix.
In many ways, DNA bonds are more programmable than conventional chemical bonds. By changing DNA’s sequence, scientists can dictate which molecules connect and where they connect. That opens the door to building crystals with customizable architectures and mechanical properties for specific applications.
In the new study, Mirkin’s team attached short DNA strands to each protein. Then, DNA pulled neighboring proteins together, assembling them into precisely designed crystals. The team also varied key design features—such as DNA strand length and placement—to determine how each variable affected crystal formation. Finally, they used X-ray crystallography to examine the resulting crystals.
“The well-defined DNA-DNA interactions drove the assembly and crystallization process,” Han said. “As a result, the proteins not only adopted specific positions and orientations, but the atoms within each protein are also aligned in the exact same way throughout the crystal. When that happens, you can use single-crystal X-ray diffraction methods to determine their structure and see atomic-level details within the protein.”
Putting the Method to the Test
To further validate the approach, the team grew more than 1,000 protein crystals and determined the atomic structures of 28 distinct protein-DNA designs. Despite systematically changing DNA length and position, the resulting crystals consistently assembled into the designed architectures. That reproducibility, together with the direct visualization of DNA double helices linking neighboring proteins within the crystals, gave the researchers confidence that DNA—not chance—directed the assembly.
“These numbers show that we didn’t just get lucky,” Mirkin said. “We systematically demonstrated this approach across literally hundreds of possibilities and showed over and over again that it’s a reliable method. The DNA bond is a fundamentally new class of chemical bond, and this work shows how it can be used in ways that conventional chemical bonds cannot—to create a new type of material that yields new fundamental knowledge as well as technological breakthroughs that could significantly benefit society.”
Funding: The study was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research and the National Science Foundation.
Published in journal: Science Advances
Title: Diffraction-quality, ultraflexible protein single crystals engineered with DNA
Authors: Zhenyu Han, and Chad A. Mirkin
Source/Credit: Northwestern University | Amanda Morris
Edited by: Scientific Frontline
Reference Number: bio073026_01
.jpg)